Monday, September 6, 2010

Rhetoric Is Not Enough

Rhetoric plays a prevalent part in religion, specifically in the process of conversion. Nephi tells us that his intent in keeping the record that would become part of the Book of Mormon was to persuade men to come unto and God and be saved. However, in religion there is another aspect that rhetoric can’t compete with, the Holy Spirit. Without the spirit’s confirmation, no amount of rhetoric can convince an individual of the validity of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Laman and Lemuel were Nephi’s older brothers. They followed their father Lehi into the wilderness. They were reprimanded by an angel and saw Nephi freed from cords they had bound him with in rebellion. They were led through the deserts of Arabia by the Liahona and were fed by game shot with Nephi’s bow. They sailed to the Promised Land in ships crafted after the manner of God by Nephi’s hand. They witnessed countless miracles and spent their days in the presence of two prophets of God. If rhetoric were sufficient to induce conversion, then Laman and Lemuel should have been faithful and righteous. Instead, they lived lives filled with wickedness and fell away from the Lord. The two brothers of Nephi were past feeling. They ignored the confirmation of the Holy Spirit until they no longer felt its promptings. Without the Spirit, conversion could not take place.

A similar instance occurred in the experience of Samuel the Lamanite. From the top of a wall, he preached the word of God. His orations were powerful enough to cause the people to throw stones and shoot arrows. His words struck a chord so deep within the people that they wanted to kill him. If his words were powerful enough to do that, then shouldn’t they have been powerful enough to convince the people that Christ would come? The answer is yes, but words alone cannot convert a soul. True conversion needs the Spirit, and the Spirit cannot dwell in unclean places. The people were wicked, sinful, unclean, and the Spirit was not with them.

For every instance where the Spirit was not present and rhetoric could not suffice, there are many others where together rhetoric and the Spirit converted souls to the gospel. When Nephi and his brethren returned to Jerusalem to bring the family of Ishmael to the wilderness, they sat and taught Ishmael the gospel. The scriptures tell us that the Lord softened the heart of Ishmael, and it was then that he believed the words of Lehi’s sons.

Another prime example of rhetoric and the Spirit is in the conversion of Alma. When Alma heard the words of Abinadi, he believed because he had witnessed the things that Abinadi spoke about. He had seen the wickedness of King Noah and Abinadi’s rhetoric made sense. Rhetoric was enough to convince Alma to run away from the king, but he wasn’t truly converted till he knelt in the king’s woods and prayed for forgiveness and confirmation. The Spirit touched Alma’s heart, and Alma knew that the gospel was true.

Thus the scriptures show us that rhetoric is essential when preaching the gospel. Words must be used to teach doctrine and prepare an individual for the confirmation of the Spirit. Without the Spirit’s confirmation, an individual isn’t truly converted. Words have immense power, but they can’t come close to the power of the Holy Spirit.

7 comments:

  1. YEEEEES! You effectively communicate that rhetoric alone is not enough and that the Spirit and rhetoric are not the same thing (which a lot of people seemed to have missed in their blog posts). You have a good structure and specific relevant examples. Your voice is persuasive and authoritative, but not too verbose. Just a few nitpicks: struck a chord, not cord with people. Also, "were powerful enough to do that" not "were so powerful enough to do that." Great piece of writing!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm sorry Erika but the distinction of the spirit and the rhetoric as distinct categories, is assumed in almost all of the Posts I've read. Things don't need to be expressly stated all the time, read into the intended meaning a little bit. Everyone agrees that they have inseparable effects that act in a synergistic manner.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for catching that Erika! I'll fix that right away.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Austin-writing is all about stating the obvious (within reason of course). That's why you get idiots arguing over symbolism and whether or not Huckleberry Finn should be analyzed despite Mark Twain's page in the front asking for it not to be. If it's not stated, you can assume anything you want, whether or not it's right. It's better to be clear, unless you want to invite debate over your meaning (which is fun too).

    ReplyDelete
  5. I love the examples you used of Samuel the Lamanite and also Laman and Lemuel. They're perfect when explaining the differences between the effects of rhetoric and the Holy Ghost. I especially loved the point you made about the Spirit not being able to dwell where Samuel was preaching because of the sin there. I enjoyed reading this!

    ReplyDelete
  6. So, rhetoric alone is not enough, but I wonder if the Spirit alone is enough. Or are they inseparable? I am having trouble thinking of an example when rhetoric was not used in converting someone to the gospel. Joseph Smith was reading the scriptures. Enos simple began to pray while out hunting, but seeing as he was the keeper of the plates, he must have read them. Interesting thoughts, overall.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great insights! Rhetoric really does have its limits--even outside of a gospel context, it takes more than just good speakers, good leaders, and memorable principles to really have a successful, happy civilization, and to really have people get along.

    As others mentioned, nice use of examples--they really demonstrate your points well and add good insights.

    ReplyDelete