Wednesday, September 15, 2010

P-I-N-G-P-O-N-G

International cinema is always a gamble whenever one dares to view it, because one can never really predict what one will actually view. Most films come from such a different cultural frame of reference that conventional guessing as to ways of plot or pacing become useless. Ping Pong as a film from Japan exemplifies this.
The film was fun to watch in some places, but in others is terribly boring as it drags on with scenes of running, stair climbing, video game playing, or smoking. The main characters, two boys who are best friends, are polar opposites, which becomes difficult to bear during the movie. The reason for this difficulty is simple: one is interesting, fun, and vibrant, and acts so through his character, while the other invented the phrase "dull boy". Since the movie is close to two hours long, it becomes difficult, then, to watch the long scenes where the boring boy runs, hits ping pong balls, or ponders on why he is always so bored. In contrast, the other character, who grows through his crisis, is exciting because of his antics, particularly when he puts his cigarette out on someones face (ouch!).
The film is also an interesting view into Japanese entertainment. The main themes of mastery, hard work pays off, and one must have strong natural talent/not everyone can make it, are "stereotypes" of the Japanese comic/cartoon genre. The fact that this is a film adaptation of a semi-popular (semi because it has not made it to the U. S. yet) comic is painfully obvious, and at times the dialogue is sophomoric and melodramatic.
All that being said, it is fun to watch the ping pong, and the hours required to achieve a high level of play are demonstrated along with the product of such work. The actors all have a look of experienced technique, which is fun to watch from a technical standpoint.
So, all in all, if you like the sport Ping Pong, this movie is for you. If not, you'll be in for a long and rather boring 2 hours.

8 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent review. I haven't seen this movie and I'm grateful that I read this before I went and saw it. I enjoy playing ping-pong and will trust your advice that it's worth going to it solely for the advanced play and technical skill exhibited. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really like the humorous angle you brought to your analysis. If anything, I would focus more on the comparison you made between our culture and Japanese culture.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree, it was too long! I didn't feel like the story line had a lot of substance to it. Although, I did find their intense ping pong games very entertaining.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree. After seeing this movie, I can second the claim that it is very exciting at parts, but can also be dull. Very good analysis!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with Sarah. You should focus a bit more on a certain point and really do some deep analyzing. Or at least just stick with one subject. I felt like this was more of a review rather than an analysis. Based on your writing, however, I'm glad I didn't see this movie! I probably would have fallen asleep during the boring parts and missed the whole point of the movie! :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. The majority of your review focused on your dislike and disinterest in the movie. As an analysis, that's not particularly helpful, but probably fine for a normal movie review. Also, keep in mind that "the themes of Japanese comics" are also the themes of the society! If you want to take that route, I'd focus more on why it's not an effective film (ie why the dialogues sophomoric and melodramatic). What you have to understand is that this is a Japanese film, and they're all about the unspoken message and implying things rather than stating them outright. With American films, you usually don't have to think too much about what the message of the film was supposed to be (this shows up a lot in their writing too. Whereas in English you state your thesis and then prove it, in Japanese culture that would be considered arrogant and rude).

    I'm not sure if being negative about the film matters. On the one hand some people (like me) that liked the movie may not appreciate the comments. On the other hand, most movie reviews I've seen are pretty blunt about how much they did/didn't care about the movie.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What are reviews if not opinionated analyses?

    As for unspoken messages, I find that comment somewhat uninformed as the movie is constantly narrated, especially in parts where the plot gets confusing, and the viewer is told what to think, as opposed to leaving it open ended. I therefore find the comment that the movie is about implication somewhat confusing... why are we told what to think if we are supposed to read implications.

    I also did not write it to be negative, but instead wrote an opinionated analyses and gave a qualification for viewing at the end.

    ReplyDelete